Guide Rehab/Consensus Committee – Preparatory project

For more information please email president@sosort.org.

Guide Rehab – A short review

See below for important background literature on this project.

General aims

  • Define/describe rehabilitation and complex intervention that is best used to manage the growing child with scoliosis.
  • Spread awareness and knowledge of the complexities of this intervention from a clinical and research point of view
  • No longer consider single treatment in isolation (Brace is just a plastic orthosis and SSE is not just exercises)
    • The best results is finding the correct combination of CBA, SSE, best possible brace, time in brace and reduce emotional load on patients

Precise Scope of Guide Rehab

  • Develop checklist to accurate report intervention studies of comprehensive care for the growing child with scoliosis
  • Seeks to ensure that the known or hypothesized active ingredients responsible for target changes are clearly articulated and that, ingredients are linked to the measurable change that they create
  • To standardize the reporting of non operative comprehensive interventions in the field of pediatric scoliosis for papers of all study designs

Design: Qualitative study including a Delphi process and consensus

  • Directors: Sabrina Donzelli, Dariusz Czaprowski, Stefano Negrini
  • Secretary: Prachi Bakarania
  • Panel of Experts in alphabetical order and per profession:
    • CPOs: Luke Stikeleather (USA) and Andreas Wuersching (Croatia)
    • SSE specialists: Eric Parent (Canda), Hagit Berdishevsky (Israel), Yavut Yakuz (Turkey)
    • MDs: Benjamin Roye (USA), Calgar Yilgor (Turkey), Angelo Aulisa (Italy)
    • 2 Patients: Joe O’Brien and Alessia Mancini

Inclusion criteria to join expert panel

  Expertise  ClinicalScientific
Last 15 yearsLast 10 years
PrescribersMinimum 500 patients per year with a prescription of brace + SSEFirst/Last/Corresponding author of published papers on braces or SSE
SSE providersMinimum 100 patients per year treated with SSE and wearing a braceFirst/Last/Corresponding author of published papers OR presenter at SOSORT or other international Meetings on SSE
Brace providersMinimum 500 braced patients per year with minimum 10% performing SSEFirst/Last/Corresponding author of published papers OR presenter at SOSORT or other international Meetings on braces
  Patients3 years of treatment with braces and SSE

Delphi Process – Inclusion Criteria

The participants in the delphi rounds and the final consensus must also be experts, with the different that only the clinical criteria from the last 10 years are considered

  Expertise  Clinical
Last 10 years
PrescribersMinimum 500 patients per year with a prescription of brace and/or SSE
SSE providersMinimum 100 patients per year treated with SSE
Brace providersMinimum 500 braced patients per year
Patients3 years of treatment with braces and SSE
  • The Delphi process will be used to establish consensus among experts
  • Participants will receive anonymous questionnaires, for 3 rounds and a core group of facilitators will analyze, summarize, and redistribute.
  •  In each round, a 5-point Likert scale (“strongly disagree”,
  • “disagree”, “neutral”, “agree”, “strongly agree”) used to assess participant agreement on
  • each item, and free-text responses will be reviewed by the facilitators for integration into future iterative rounds.

Procedure

  StepMethodDeadlinesMeeting
Definition of the panelCall11/1 
Definition of the methodology and presentation of GUIDE-Rehab120’ Meeting11/116/1
Brainstorm to define the preliminary list of targets90’ Meeting20/123/1
Identification of the targets and collection of other proposalsDelphi8/2 
Presentation of the results Brainstorm to define the ingredients to achieve the first set of identified targets120’ Meeting22/2TBD
Identification of the ingredients of the first set of identified targets and collection of other proposalsDelphi1/3 
Brainstorm to define the ingredients to achieve the second set of identified targets120’ Meeting15/3TBD
Identification of the ingredients of the second set of identified targets and collection of other proposalsDelphi22/3 
Presentation of the results and agreement on elements to discuss at the final Consensus Meeting120’ Meeting5/4TBD
Consensus Conference 29/429/4 14-17

Step by Step Procedure

  1. Describe the intervention 
  2. Definition of the target of each intervention component 
  3. What is the underlying intervention theory for each component? (Including published evidence and theories coming from experience)
  4. Focus on the targets, ingredients, and components to enhance the description of the intervention theory.
  5.  Intervention ingredients and quantity, their tailoring  and quantity changes 

Glossary of terms

Background treatment: All interventions provided to all study participants (intervention and comparison) which are common to both groups..

Intervention type: Classification of the studied intervention, ranging from an intervention component to a complex rehabilitation program. 

Rehabilitation program: A complex intervention that meets all aspects of the definition of rehabilitation for research purposes developed by Cochrane Rehabilitation in collaboration with global stakeholders (A2).

Intervention for rehabilitation: An intervention used in rehabilitation that can be implemented as a stand-alone treatment or a component of a rehabilitation program.

Intervention theory: The biological, psychological and/or social reason(s) why the intervention should work.

Intervention component: The set of active ingredients proposed to change a single intervention target.

Component theory: The biological, psychological and/or social reason(s) why the component should work. 

Intervention target: A measurable aspect of the functioning or contextual factors hypothesized to be directly changed by the active ingredients of the intervention component. It could coincide with one of the intervention outcomes or be an intermediate outcome of the intervention component, allowing for the achievement of the rehabilitation program’s outcome.

Active ingredient: A single constituent of the intervention responsible alone or with other ingredients for the therapeutic action.

Attributes of an active ingredient: Materials, procedures, personnel, mode of delivery, context, and team factors characteristic of intervention delivery.